Not Becoming. Returning.
- Dec 26, 2025
- 2 min read

The first time someone asked me who I was outside of my marriage, I didn’t know how to answer.
Not because I didn’t want to. Because the question didn’t make sense yet.
By the time my marriage collapsed, I was in my fifties. I had lived an entire life inside that relationship. I had raised children. I had endured things. I had adapted, survived, functioned.
The girl I had been before it all felt like a stranger.
I was in therapy three times a week then. Not for growth. Not for insight. To keep me alive. To keep me from harming myself while everything I had built my identity around lay in pieces.
At some point, my therapist asked me to reconnect with who I was before the relationship.
I remember thinking, That’s a strange question.
I had married at nineteen. I was barely an adult. Practically a child. Whatever version of me existed then couldn’t possibly apply to the woman sitting in that room now.
How could she?
I had lived decades since then. I knew things she couldn’t have imagined. I had endured pain she never should have had to carry.
I told myself there was no going back. That the person I had been before the marriage was irrelevant now.
But the question didn’t go away.
So eventually, cautiously, I took a step toward it.
Not with certainty. With curiosity.
I tried remembering small things. Not traits or identities. Just moments. Preferences. Sensations.
And something unexpected happened.
I didn’t feel like I was inventing myself.
I felt like I was returning.
Tentatively at first. Like knocking on a door I wasn’t sure I was allowed to open. But when it opened, it didn’t feel foreign.
It felt familiar.
More and more of myself flooded back in. Not the naïve girl. Not the unmarked version of me. But something essential. Something that had been waiting.
For a while, I described this as becoming someone new.
That was the only language I had for it.
But that wasn’t actually true.
The person I had become during the marriage — the hyper-vigilant, self-erasing, constantly accommodating version — that was the constructed self.
The adaptation.
What I was doing now wasn’t becoming.
It was separating.
Letting go of who I had to be in order to survive, and reclaiming who I had been before survival took over.
That distinction matters.
Because one implies invention. The other implies recovery.
And recovery doesn’t erase what you lived through. It integrates it.
Looking back, I understand why I couldn’t answer that question earlier. Why I didn’t even realize I had lost myself.
You can’t notice the absence of self while you’re still using every ounce of energy to endure.
That awareness only comes once the danger has passed.
Once you’re no longer bracing.
Once there’s finally enough quiet to hear what’s missing.
And when it comes, it doesn’t arrive with drama.
It arrives with recognition.





Comments